10 Jan [Dr. Peter Kreeft submitted this excerpt from select portions of his book Between Heaven & Hell, which depicts a hypothetical postmortum dialog. Between Heaven & Hell has ratings and 96 reviews. David said: On November 22nd, when I was eleven years old three well known figures died within. Between Heaven and Hell. A Dialog Somewhere Beyond Death with John F. Kennedy, C. S. Lewis Aldous Huxley. by Peter Kreeft · Apologetics.
|Published (Last):||10 March 2009|
|PDF File Size:||10.99 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.43 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Actually, the term peter kreeft between heaven and hell of God is sometimes used in Scripture to refer to creatures. Kennedy all died on November 22, You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
Betweej did enjoy the Socratic dialog, as well as the arguments Lewis made from a literary point of view when talking about the Gospels as truth or made up stories. Arius, a fourth-century heretic who carried half the church with him even after the Council of Nicea addressed the issue by clearly and strongly affirming Jesus’ divinity. I wish more time was spent on that section, for my own selfish reasons, but can understand why Kreeft would’ve spent the bulk of peter kreeft between heaven and hell book on the pluralism that seems to plague modern society.
Start peter kreeft between heaven and hell Between Heaven and Hell on your Kindle in under a minute. Although there are some obvious theological issues in the book especially being set in Purgatorythe book is very readable and enjoyable.
If he does, then he is intellectually bad—very bad, in fact, because that’s a pretty large confusion! Is it possible to know about life after death? I see the point, but I disagree with the route taken to get there, especially if one views the Bible not as an accurate historical record, but as a collection of oral histories. This is a Socratic dialogue featuring three men who died on November 22, And Huxley believed in eastern pantheism. I don’t deny the author;s point of view or attempt to say he is wrong I just peter kreeft between heaven and hell don’t feel that this was very well portrayed as an argument among one more than one person.
Shall we review some of the other things Jesus said that more clearly claim divinity? To be blunt, humanism – at least the version laid out in this book – falls flat to reason and proper study. Again, Kreeft admits to writing this book of dialog – somewhere between heaven and hell – in three days. An intellectually bad man, a morally bad man, a good man or God. One suspects that the real conversation would have been so much livelier and better than anyone could peter kreeft between heaven and hell it.
Published on June 4, As distinct from your new, modern one? There were several times where Lewis would win an uell that he really shouldn’t have considering all the counter arguments that could have been made.
It is more of a debate book than a resource to grow in faith and should be treated as such.
Then he was intellectually bad. Lewis and Aldous Huxley. It’s limited by a couple of factors: Related Video Shorts 0 Upload your video.
They were Jews, remember, not Hindus. Bookmark us on your phone!
Peter Kreeft: “Between Heaven and Hell” – C.S. Lewis Foundation
In other words, for the doubter who has not yet given up on faith and gone betseen over to social justice atheism. Published 1 year ago. There are no discussion topics on this book yet. And wolf parents give wolf nature to their wolf children. The second premise is that he isn’t a bad man.
Between Heaven & Hell (excerpt)
He thinks he is Lewis! Combining logical argument and literary imagination, Kreeft portrays Lewis as a Christian theist, Kennedy as a modern humanist and Huxley as an Eastern pantheist. The Best Things in Life. They are each representative of different worldviews in heavrn conversation. Lewis emerges as the far superior intellect, peter kreeft between heaven and hell I think is quite accurate but which I think would have come across not quite as blatantly with two men he didn’t know personally.